| About InfoWorld : Advertise : Subscribe : Contact Us : Awards : Events : Store |
 |
||||
|
||||
 | ||||
 |
|
|||
 |
||||
|
|
|
||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 TEST CENTER 2002 Server impresses By P.J. Connolly May 11, 2001 Microsoft's Beta 2 release of its server OS offers better security features and an interface makeover
Our look at Windows 2002 Server Beta 2 shows that IT leaders should face little difficulty in adding 2002 Server to the mix if their IT staff members have solid experience with Windows 2000. It should be safe for IT managers to base their planning for 2002 Server's system requirements on the specifications for Windows 2000. Note, however, that key capacity areas such as system memory and maximum addressable storage will scale greatly in 64-bit versions of 2002 Server. Customers concerned with the stability of yet another version of Windows should be reassured by our post-review experience with Beta 1 of Advanced Server (see our review of Beta 1). After we finished putting it through its paces last November, we left a server with Beta 1 running in the Test Center as a simple check for memory leaks and other odd behavior. It ran without incident until we shut it down in April to install Beta 2. That's not the kind of stability we anticipate from beta software, but we always enjoy being pleasantly surprised. We expect Beta 2 will yield similar results in long-term use. Several improvements to Active Directory are included in the Beta 2 release, including a simple DNS (Domain Name System) configuration checker. Because Active Directory relies on DNS, even a minor error could have serious repercussions. One note of caution: When you make a Windows 2002 Server an Active Directory Domain Controller, you'll run into minor compatibility snags between the Active Directory schemata used by Windows 2000 and Windows 2002 Server, so this part of your upgrade will require extra care. We are comfortable with what we have seen so far, but servers are usually mission-critical items. Therefore, we advise businesses to upgrade prudently. Although 2002 Server looks like a horse to bet on, companies preparing to install Windows 2000 servers in the next 12 months should continue to plan on using Windows 2000 while waiting for the first service pack to Windows 2002 Server. This caveat notwithstanding, we think Microsoft's on the right track with Beta 2. Senior Analyst P.J. Connolly (pj_connolly@infoworld.com) covers networking, operating systems, and security.
 RELATED ARTICLES  Pushing for a one-Windows worldGoodbye DOS, hello XPIIS 6.0 gets feature boostRELATED SUBJECTS Operating SystemsSPONSORED WHITE PAPERS 
SPONSORED LINKS
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
